.

Tuesday, March 19, 2019

Canterbury Tales Essay: Importance of the Tale of Wife of Bath

Importance of the baloney of Wife of Bath   Some critiques of Wife of Bath make the get that the tommyrot is an anti-climax after the robust presentation of the Prologue. Certainly, the prologue of Wife of Bath is robust. With its unbeatable vitality, strong language (queynte etc.) and homely, vigorous vocabulary (eg. the references to barley-brede and mice), it is the Wifes personality -- certainly an exceedingly robust one -- that dominates. There is a certain brash zipper to the whole of the Prologue, whether because of the forcefulness with which the Wife presents her arguments against the antifeminists (eg. her comments about clerks being unable to do Venus werkes and taking it out on sely wyfs in print), or because of her theatrical presentation of the methods with which she amply gave her husbands the wo that is in mariage. The Wife, as speaker of her Prologue, has an earthy, homely wholeheartedness that pervades the whole of the Prologue as such, it would ce rtainly be fitting to apply the title robust to the Prologue. good paragraph             In contrast, the Tale (or the Wife as speaker of the Tale) is arguably lacking in a similiar robust vitality. Its very opening, with its Arthurian/fairy-tale references, sets the widely distributed tone -- quasi-courtly, learned, fantasy rather than the earthy reality presented with such insurgent attractiveness in the Prologue by the Wife (eg. dronken as a mous, glob a-caterwawed). Elegant and learned -- even a little pedantic (redeth eek Senek, and redeth eek Boece as well as the references to Dante) -- there is, comparatively, a lack of the energy that galvanised the Prologue. Moreover, minded(p) what the rea... ...          As such, it would not be totally accurate to speak of the Tale as being an anticlimax. While its seeming gentillesse may be prime somewhat colorless after the Prologue, it nevertheless reinforces the Wifes ideas of female maistrie, and certainly this is frank by the end also, the ending arguably serves as a climax, summarizing many another(prenominal) of the Wifes themes (that women should have the maistrie, that she wants a constant supply of young virile husbands, that conglutination can be happy if a husband first resigns potential to his wife (cf. her ending the Prologue with the kindness she showed to Jankin and their ostensible happiness)). Therefore, even if the Tale does not work up inexorably to a climax as the Prologue per se does, it would be unfair to claim that it has no climax, or that it is an anticlimax.  

No comments:

Post a Comment